Thread

1. jeremyjh · 1791037692 · focus · HN ↗

   I think its pretty easy to solve these problems: Whenever an AI agent commits a crime, the CEO is held personally accountable, as if they'd committed it themselves.

   1. dkasper · 1791037952 · focus · HN ↗

      This has been litigated endlessly with guns. The ceo of Smith & Wesson is not personally responsible for what people do with their guns.

      1. amelius · 1791038904 · focus · HN ↗

         Ah, but that's because when the gun was purchased, it actually changed ownership.

         This is not the case with SaaS services.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.