Thread

1. unified101 · 1791017006 · focus · HN ↗

   The actual answer is there's operational cost to handling cash, or payment methods beyond the ones that cover 99.9% people well. You pay more for the extra hassle the whole system has to serve that .1%

   You may not like or disagree with it. But it's the true answer.

   1. takipsizad · 1791018280 · focus · HN ↗

      You dont have to handle cash directly, you can have kiosks that are dedicated to adding cash to a public transit card and they will solve the problem you are talking about.

      1. jbs789 · 1791019225 · focus · HN ↗

         Who collects the cash? Who maintains the kiosks?

         1. takipsizad · 1791020106 · focus · HN ↗

            First: You can have kiosks (in central locations like metro stations) or you can have dedicated points like where a market collects the cash and they add the balance that way. Second: The public transit company. we aren't splitting the atom here.

            1. jbs789 · 1791029693 · focus · HN ↗

               Ah, and those services are free?

               1. fsflover · 1791033952 · focus · HN ↗

                  Are the credit card transactions free?

                  1. jbs789 · 1791039325 · focus · HN ↗

                     Cheaper than managing cash, which is the relevant comparison.

                     1. fsflover · 1791056385 · focus · HN ↗

                        Citation needed.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.