“If” is temporary. More TPS is the question of time. In such usecase human in the loop will be eliminated as nobody, even anybody with fastest recognition, will be the slowest part.
How many industries are? How many use cases are possible?
If you solve everything, what will people do? Sitting on the beach, sipping drinks?
Massive degradation of human brains and rise of neurodegenerative illnesses as unused device starts to be erroneous?
1,000,000 TPS is good for some use cases but not publicly available…
Higher TPS by itself wouldn't remove the humans in the loop. Humans in the loop aren't there to make things faster, but to make them right - current LLMs can't do that on their own in most real world projects.
On the contrary, I would say that higher TPS would make humans in the loop much more productive, because the current long wait times mean that you lose focus and flow.
totally agreed on the "focus" aspect of it
that is why i was so happy about composer models from cursor when they came out but they werent very great
imagine opsu 5.5 level models at those speeds and faster.
sixtyj · · focus · HN ↗
How many industries are? How many use cases are possible?
If you solve everything, what will people do? Sitting on the beach, sipping drinks?
Massive degradation of human brains and rise of neurodegenerative illnesses as unused device starts to be erroneous?
1,000,000 TPS is good for some use cases but not publicly available…
danmaz74 · · focus · HN ↗
On the contrary, I would say that higher TPS would make humans in the loop much more productive, because the current long wait times mean that you lose focus and flow.
echohive42 · · focus · HN ↗
echohive42 · · focus · HN ↗