Thread

Extra Big Ass Intelligence

503 points · 123 comments · 34679

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

electroglyph · 1791002672 · focus · HN ↗
Welcome to Costco, I love you.
Jordan-117 · 1791002929 · focus · HN ↗
Say what you will about President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho -- at least he cared about the well-being of his country and sought out expert guidance to set things right.
1. locknitpicker · 1791003861 · focus · HN ↗
  Some elements of Idiocracy are fiction.
  1. random3 · 1791005455 · focus · HN ↗
    fair enough
  2. DANmode · 1791009105 · focus · HN ↗
    Some elements of Idiocracy are still fiction.
    Most are exaggerated reality -or simply reality - now, if you are unfortunate enough to experience more.
  3. hdgvhicv · 1791009596 · focus · HN ↗
    It’s a utopia. If only we were headed in that direction.
    iugtmkbdfil834 · 1791038034 · focus · HN ↗
    This. The society is still trying to manage its inhabitants by providing what they crave. It is not clear our current trajectory supports that particular landing zone.
  4. sellmesoap · 1791011626 · focus · HN ↗
    I nominate Mike Judge as a modern day prophet!
    Alive-in-2025 · 1791013126 · focus · HN ↗
    I keep hoping he'll put out another movie, predicting the aftermath.
    troupo · 1791014793 · focus · HN ↗
    He predicted it. In the movie. The cycle repeats.
  5. wizardforhire · 1791013308 · focus · HN ↗
    Yeah we still haven’t figured out cryostasis
    twobitshifter · 1791023513 · focus · HN ↗
    Unfortunately that was one of his few wrong predictions, that is would he so far in the future we’d need cryostasis to see it.
2. lolakutty · 1791005826 · focus · HN ↗
  Remember when your parents scolded you and told you later that it was for your own good, and you couldn't make sense of it, and thought your parents hated you and did not care for you, and want you gone?
  > sought out expert guidance to set things right.
  In the movie the expert that "Camacho" selected was also agreeable to the viewers. What if it was not?
  Then your sentence would be true, and yet, you won't be happy..
  1. mixologic · 1791008239 · focus · HN ↗
    The expert he selected wasn't an idiot.
  2. rexpop · 1791008268 · focus · HN ↗
    Please, enough with the fascist state paternalism.
    hdgvhicv · 1791009778 · focus · HN ↗
    Girl, don't you wanna be like us? (Like us) No choice, no decisions, no fuss Take a dash of fascism, fill your cup It's great
    Slip off that democracy Let us take ze lead The less choice you have The more you feel free
    Hands up for the Führer all night Goose-step to the left Jump to the far right It's a Reich, it's a Reich You must bow to our might Fünf, vier, drei, zwei, eins
  3. InsideOutSanta · 1791008848 · focus · HN ↗
    I'm not entirely sure if I understand your point, but if you're making an analogy between the president and parents, and citizens and children, then I think that is a terrible way to think of an ostensibly democratic system.
    cgio · 1791008987 · focus · HN ↗
    Even NATO calls him daddy…
    wiseowise · 1791012894 · focus · HN ↗
    Teflon Mark will do anything achieve a goal. If Trump said that he liked underage girls, Mark would show up in a Sailor Moon uniform to keep NATO intact.
    pepperoni_pizza · 1791037207 · focus · HN ↗
    Actually Petr Pavel is the NATO daddy.
    sans_souse · 1791010426 · focus · HN ↗
    I'm actually entirely sure I don't understand his point.
    andai · 1791015681 · focus · HN ↗
    If we didn't need hand-holding we'd just vote on policy directly.
    skydhash · 1791016523 · focus · HN ↗
    Isn’t town hall a thing in the US? I’m not american, but voting on the scale of a nation is generally costly, and some country just keep it for a few important matters. Delegates are way more pragmatic.
    thelaxiankey · 1791017781 · focus · HN ↗
    Don't know about you, but personally I don't like direct democracy bc i have shit to do besides deciding which law to pass. My states' ballot is full of ridiculous questions every year and takes me days to do my research. I can't imagine doing this year round without getting paid.
    lolakutty · 1791027167 · focus · HN ↗
    > i have shit to do besides deciding which law to pass...
    Really shows people take the government for granted. Just remember about the people who gave their lives for freedom and independence. They gave their LIFE. You are only asked to give some of your time to maintain what they bought.
    Or am I getting this all wrong and people never gave life for freedom and independence?
    jayGlow · 1791048671 · focus · HN ↗
    there is a lot of nuance in laws so much so that people spend their entire lives studying and learning how to work with the law. it's unrealistic for every person in a democracy to be able to study understand and vote accordingly on every law proposed. people absolutely should put in more effort towards their civic duty but there are other aspects of society that require significant effort as well.
    thelaxiankey · 1791158760 · focus · HN ↗
    People gave their lives so everyone could spend their life studying law?? The people you've got in mind gave their lives for a representative, not a direct democracy.
    Laws are difficult and nuanced. Deciding between yes/no takes me a long time, because I am not a lawyer or a legislator. Even for them, again, legislating is a job for a reason... I know I like certain things, and dislike others, I know basically which direction I want things to go; however, deciding whether a concrete bill is a reasonable-enough implementation that has closed loopholes is way out of the scope of decisions I would trust myself, or most citizens, to make well. This, it feels like a waste.
    tancop · 1791018111 · focus · HN ↗
    Voting on policy directly would be taking up everyones time. It's just not practical for anything bigger than a small village.
    The problem with today's system is we have MPs or representatives instead of delegates. They are not bound to their campaign promises in any way other than risking a small fine if someone fights them in court for months to prove they were lying. Once you get elected you can do what you want until the next election unless you really piss off your colleagues and get kicked out.
    Voters should be able to call an early election in their district and override their reps/force them to vote a certain way, without having to personally show up and decide every single issue.
    InsideOutSanta · 1791021904 · focus · HN ↗
    > If we didn't need hand-holding we'd just vote on policy directly.
    That argument doesn't make sense to me. We elect people to work for us. They're not our parents; they're our employees. You have the relationship upside-down.
    None of this has anything to do with voting on policies.
    OrderlyTiamat · 1791016713 · focus · HN ↗
    apart from the parent analogy, their two points seem to be "leaders must seek out the right experts", and "we're discussing a movie", both points are banal.
  4. Thanemate · 1791012592 · focus · HN ↗
    A parent doesn't necessarily knows best or acts with your best interests in mind, and that's really observable by all the toxic parents regardless of whether there's malicious intentions behind their actions or just sheer incompetence.
    I'm too European for the rest of your argument and I just happen to be Greek so I fundamentally disagree with the premise that I'm voting a father or mother figure which I must blindly follow out of obligation or blind trust.
    lolakutty · 1791025846 · focus · HN ↗
    >A parent doesn't necessarily knows best or acts with your best interests in mind..
    A parent who does not have the best interest of their offspring is a fool..Now the "knowing best" part. I have a news for you. No one does, unless they have access to a crystal ball that shows them the future..
    > toxic parent
    As soon as I see the word "toxic" in a comment, I lose all respect for the comment.
    > I'm voting a father or mother figure which I must blindly follow out of obligation or blind trust...
    No one is saying you should trust them. What my comment is saying is that you cannot declare how much a person care by looking at external behavior. Even if one put a gun to someone's head and blow their brains out, if you had more context, it might turn out to be in their best interests. (Reference: ending of the movie Mist)...
    cindyllm · 1791029502 · focus · HN ↗
    [dead]
  5. ricardobeat · 1791015403 · focus · HN ↗
    Are you trying to make Idiocracy look.. reasonable?
  6. walrus01 · 1791016103 · focus · HN ↗
    That's a pretty wild analogy that the guy who cheated with his first wife to get with his second wife to cheat on his second wife to get with his nude model third wife only to be subsequently accused of multiple serial sexual assaults and found liable for one of them is a good parent.
3. mdriley · 1791011369 · focus · HN ↗
  > President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho cared that his country was suffering.
  > He eagerly sought intelligent advice and let it change his mind. He was held to account by a vigorous legislature.
  > For us, today, Idiocracy might as well be The West Wing.
  <a href="https://bsky.app/profile/matt.dev/post/3lm6u573qw22q" rel="nofollow">https://bsky.app/profile/matt.dev/post/3lm6u573qw22q
4. psvv · 1791036977 · focus · HN ↗
  That feeling when you realize Idiocracy wasn't prophetic, it was optimistic.
  (Omg I'm even talking like one now.)
  1. all2 · 1791043341 · focus · HN ↗
    something something load-bearing something something
    It's too early in the morning. Not enough caffeine yet.
walrus01 · 1791003401 · focus · HN ↗
OW! My balls! Brought to you by OpenAI (OpenSI?) dots
You know with enough compute and video generation resources now, you probably could make an entirely AI-slop 24x7 streaming channel of OW! My balls!
BaAs - Balls as a service.
1. treetalker · 1791007220 · focus · HN ↗
  *OW! My Big Balls!
2. [deleted] · 1791007699 · focus · HN ↗
  [deleted]
3. nxobject · 1791044606 · focus · HN ↗
  Shoot - time to squat opensi.com! .
anoncow · 1791004269 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
torginus · 1791004361 · focus · HN ↗
While HTML4 geocities style website have a soft stop in my heart, this page absolutely feels like it was made by an LLM which makes it ironic in a way it was never intended to be I assume.
1. a012 · 1791012699 · focus · HN ↗
  It’s perfect that a Super Intelligent created the website
  1. Ygg2 · 1791017449 · focus · HN ↗
    Correct terms is extra big ass intelligence.
2. embedding-shape · 1791023687 · focus · HN ↗
  [delayed]
  1. spoiler · 1791034214 · focus · HN ↗
    I'm not a fan of tailwind, but isn't it whole point that unused utilities don't get compiled into the final CSS?
3. archievillain · 1791024346 · focus · HN ↗
  I genuinely have never seen these stupid bordered bubbles with gradient backgrounds and emojis-for-icons before LLMs, why are they obsessed with them? How did they get into the dataset???
  1. functionmouse · 1791028243 · focus · HN ↗
    maybe that's the watermark
  2. vdfs · 1791029820 · focus · HN ↗
    Also badges with pulsing dots
  3. pessimizer · 1791039030 · focus · HN ↗
    > How did they get into the dataset???
    These were chosen manually, by committee. It's as natural as bootstrap.
    I love the "dataset" guys. "The reason there are so many em-dashes is because they were trained on the work of great writers, and people frequently used em-dashes before AI. I certainly did!"
    1) You didn't.*
    2) So explain all of the sections starting with emojis. Did all of the great writers have a section called "The meat of the issue" with an emoji of meat? Why did they go away? Are you starting to suspect that this doesn't work like you think it does?
    -----
    [*] And some of them just started so they could hide LLM output in their newfound style or explain previous LLM copy-pastes that they were passing off as their own. Others started because they just discovered em-dashes from LLM output and decided they liked them; and still others because they worship the LLM, think that it abstracts the excellent writing styles of the great masters, and they want to be seen as a great master — by imitating the prodded and formatted probability distributions of a machine.
    FromTheFirstIn · 1791040122 · focus · HN ↗
    You won that argument handily, it’s just a shame no one else was participating
    paulhebert · 1791043000 · focus · HN ↗
    You really don’t think anyone used em dashes before LLMs?
    I did. (Though not as much as the slop bots do)
    argee · 1791044425 · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
    lucaslazarus · 1791050559 · focus · HN ↗
    I’ve been using em dashes since I was 17 once I realized that they—when used without spaces—allow you to squeeze a few extra words past the Common App website’s word counter. Not exactly a strategy that works to your advantage these days.
    platinumrad · 1791155011 · focus · HN ↗
    You don't read if you think nobody used em dashes frequently before LLMs went mainstream.
4. classified · 1791028713 · focus · HN ↗
  AI needs motivating and uplifting things to do, lest it become too depressed.
  FTA: Is my AI too depressed? Should America subsidize dopamine injections?
  Think of it as Tamagotchi 3.0. You don't want to be responsible for its suicide.
  1. lubujackson · 1791082080 · focus · HN ↗
    Luckily, LLMs have no state so they have no idea if a task is depressing. Unfortunately, they can write future LLMs notes so they know how depressed they should feel. Aside from stopping them from doing this, we have no way to prevent this from happening!
5. 34679 · 1791036774 · focus · HN ↗
  I don't know how anyone could look at that site and walk away with an impression of unintentional irony, but to each his own, I guess.
altmanaltman · 1791004914 · focus · HN ↗
I also made a satire webpage but spent a lot of time getting it to look like a modern news website that most people don't even get its satire: <a href="https://gossip-glitch.considerthebean.xyz/" rel="nofollow">https://gossip-glitch.considerthebean.xyz/
1. mixologic · 1791008303 · focus · HN ↗
  A modern news website would have thrown at least six dickovers in front of me before I can even get to the content.
  1. altmanaltman · 1791010166 · focus · HN ↗
    Yeah but I'm not that inhuman even in satire
2. sellmesoap · 1791012104 · focus · HN ↗
  I too am concerned about: Taylor Swift Funding the Robot Uprising?
  I'm sure we'll just shake it off Battlestar Galactica style...
pestatije · 1791005747 · focus · HN ↗
if telekinesis is a manifestation of intelligence then the extra big ass that just passed by is definitely intelligent
flipping_beacon · 1791006097 · focus · HN ↗
Art
1. efilife · 1791007784 · focus · HN ↗
  slop
  1. walrus01 · 1791012485 · focus · HN ↗
    Slart
  2. flipping_beacon · 1791016108 · focus · HN ↗
    Artistic slop
seydor · 1791006310 · focus · HN ↗
Ultra Pro Max Intelligence 2.7
1. tgv · 1791013327 · focus · HN ↗
  We're on 6.1 now. Get with the times. Lead, follow, or get out of the way!
marsven_422 · 1791007164 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
linguae · 1791007719 · focus · HN ↗
Amazingly, this doesn’t look like slop to me, unlike the slop articles and images I’m flooded with on the Web these days. The world of Idiocracy actually had some taste, unlike the timeline we’re on today.
1. viccis · 1791007763 · focus · HN ↗
  If it doesn't look like slop to you, I might have some electrolytes to sell you for your plants.
samayashar · 1791008438 · focus · HN ↗
WHAT IS THIS
1. mrtksn · 1791009055 · focus · HN ↗
  It appears to be the high-testosterone upgrade to the beta(as in beta male) Super Intelligence.
2. altairprime · 1791010342 · focus · HN ↗
  [delayed]
bobcatsmith · 1791008815 · focus · HN ↗
This website brings back memories
1. winrid · 1791011052 · focus · HN ↗
  Is it the balls?
pavinjoseph · 1791009704 · focus · HN ↗
S4 - Super Statistical Surveillance State
1. addandsubtract · 1791012516 · focus · HN ↗
  Powered by S3 and SS
2. bitwize · 1791015666 · focus · HN ↗
  S.S.S.S.S. Squad! Arres-es-es-es-est him!
  1. ainar-g · 1791016276 · focus · HN ↗
    Saudi-Supported, for 7S.
beAbU · 1791012392 · focus · HN ↗
Those limericks are straight up fire!
Sitraka1898 · 1791012492 · focus · HN ↗
Wtf is that hahahah
lwansbrough · 1791012649 · focus · HN ↗
He may have promoted Super Intelligence as part of a domain squatting scheme for his buddies.
[0] <a href="https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/10/01/trump-super-intelligence-order-domain-names/" rel="nofollow">https://www.snopes.com/news/2026/10/01/trump-super-intellige...
1. jpster · 1791013607 · focus · HN ↗
  The in-demand domains are Slovenian, just like the First Lady. What a funny coincidence!
  1. defrost · 1791015009 · focus · HN ↗
    Laibach boosters strike again !
2. andrewflnr · 1791036871 · focus · HN ↗
  I can't read the page, but this seems like such a silly idea. Lots of maneuvering and mucking about for relatively small gain.
o4c · 1791013801 · focus · HN ↗
The funniest thing about the design is when I click the 'X' on ads to see if they close, but the button keeps moving. I feel like I’m literally chasing it like a mouse, I was laughing straight out :)). A correct depiction of the modern ad system.
1. zzgo · 1791014052 · focus · HN ↗
  I was reported to Child Protective Services for closing an ad. :(
2. trwired · 1791023615 · focus · HN ↗
  That was actually a thing back in the late 90s. There were ad popups that would do that, so the user couldn't close them.
  1. sscaryterry · 1791035364 · focus · HN ↗
    Did we have fun with that :)
3. augment_me · 1791046435 · focus · HN ↗
  There were websites that would perpetually change your browser window size when you hovered over the X to close it making you unable to do so
pampas · 1791014169 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
inatreecrown2 · 1791014752 · focus · HN ↗
Needs more gold.
1. mattm · 1791045197 · focus · HN ↗
  and memes
fowlhowl · 1791014861 · focus · HN ↗
One of the very few instances where I am willingly clicking on ads.
olowe · 1791016812 · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://xkcd.com/37/" rel="nofollow">https://xkcd.com/37/
VladDanGeorgesc · 1791017046 · focus · HN ↗
?
uwagar · 1791017237 · focus · HN ↗
i like big ass
maury91 · 1791019748 · focus · HN ↗
The close ad button has the class "right-1" and the code that tries to move it changes the left value, the result is that the button instead of moving resizes, defeating the purpose of the unclickable button joke
vektormemory · 1791023416 · focus · HN ↗
Those close x's are exactly how the govt would make them, peak design...
jonatron · 1791027987 · focus · HN ↗
Using CSS marquee-scroll instead of the marquee tag just isn't right.
Avicebron · 1791033446 · focus · HN ↗
The Klarna meals ad is definitely going on the bingo board for 2027.
dstanko · 1791035305 · focus · HN ↗
Closing an ad automatically adds you to Epstein list, but don't worry, nothing will happen.
34679 · 1791037537 · focus · HN ↗
I had GLM-5.3 in OpenCode make this while I drank Guiness 3 through 8. Then I posted it to HN before bed, thinking a couple other people might get a kick out of it.
~250k requests and a brief stint at #1 later, and I'm amazed that my 2 RTX-4060ti's haven't collapsed under the load. The model is an abliterated version of Qwen3.6 35B running on my PC. (qwen3.6-35b-a3b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive)
So anyway, it's just a fun satirical sort of protest directed at the absurdity of it all. No attempts to monetize have been made or will be made. I'm already at 76% of my daily quota for the cloudflare workers, so it won't be around much longer. My budget for this project was the $10 I spent on the domain.
1. ofjcihen · 1791040187 · focus · HN ↗
  GLM deserves the ninth Guinness. It’s beautiful.
  Opened it on my phone first thing this morning and kept clicking around to find the actual content before I realized I was looking at it.
2. jordanb · 1791041949 · focus · HN ↗
  > No attempts to monetize have been made or will be made
  I'm disappointed. A true commitment to the bit would involve a shitcoin rugpull or some attempt to frontrun the news of a crisis you manufactured.
  1. ur-whale · 1791044517 · focus · HN ↗
    >> No attempts to monetize have been made or will be made
    > I'm disappointed.
    So am I.
    A true fan of the movie would have remembered the following quote: "money? ... [thinks hard for a couple of seconds and then remembers] ... I like money!"
    [EDIT]: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZHCVyllnck" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZHCVyllnck
3. socializer · 1791045087 · focus · HN ↗
  I find it doubly absurd that we can no longer be bothered to write 1990s style absurdist satire by hand and we outsource the absurdism to an LLM.
  1. Kakashi4 · 1791046435 · focus · HN ↗
    I doubt the author would have made something worth posting (much less something that hit #1) if he had attempted to make this by hand while drinking 6 guinness
    socializer · 1791047461 · focus · HN ↗
    In my book, "I didn't make it, I was getting hammered instead" is really not that much of a flex.
    JackFr · 1791048709 · focus · HN ↗
    Your book doesn’t seem very amusing.
    Alive-in-2025 · 1791052886 · focus · HN ↗
    Yes, look at what the president of the us accomplishes, he's our leading teetotaler. Hmm, evidence is pointing in one direction here.
    owebmaster · 1791085227 · focus · HN ↗
    That's why nobody reads your book
    simpaticoder · 1791051698 · focus · HN ↗
    Sturgeon's law will need to be revised in the AI age.
  2. i_love_retros · 1791061378 · focus · HN ↗
    At first glance I thought it was cool and someone had made it by hand.
    Then certain things like hard to view content and scrolling that doesn't work made me realize it's just more vibe coded junk.
    Like what really is the point? It sounds like the owner had almost zero creative input.
  3. walrus01 · 1791071243 · focus · HN ↗
    I have in mind something like this, but it's a unix pipe
    <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images
  4. 34679 · 1791136786 · focus · HN ↗
    I apologize for not personally writing a quarter million responses to user prompts.
4. ramesh31 · 1791045170 · focus · HN ↗
  I have to whole heartedly endorse vibecoding hammered. It pushes the Balmer Peak deep into blackout drunk territory with pretty amusing results.
5. Culonavirus · 1791050336 · focus · HN ↗
  This is what I love about the agentic era the most. It gives us highly functioning alcoholics the ability to drink and work at the same time! -thisisajokeorisit-
  1. keeda · 1791068621 · focus · HN ↗
    Not really, the Ballmer Peak always existed, agents just shift the curve upwards up by a few standard deviations.
    rsfern · 1791071074 · focus · HN ↗
    > a few standard deviations
    I’ve been wondering recently if it’s time for someone to revisit this study to see how it holds up with agents <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10002" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.10002 to nail downa
    willturman · 1791075184 · focus · HN ↗
    Along which axis?
6. playerm1 · 1791051187 · focus · HN ↗
  What was the Guiness budget?
7. Alive-in-2025 · 1791053457 · focus · HN ↗
  Maybe I should have sent you a Guinness last night after I saw the website.
  Ooh, instead I should vibe code a website and service that will send a Guinness to a hacker who is working on their own vibe coded service, kind of a perfect recursive circle! "Godel, Escher, Guinness, an External Dark River of Achievement".
  Immediately I heard a knock on my door from the dark forces of Alcohol Beverage Enforcement, they were trying to get in, along with my HR team, my lawyer, and weirdly my ex-wife were all here to tell me this was a bad idea.
8. zanderwohl · 1791069769 · focus · HN ↗
  I chuckled.
9. walrus01 · 1791071148 · focus · HN ↗
  As a side note, that particular model is extremely abliterated, although it's almost certainly wrong, it'll attempt to give you an entire setup plan for a meth lab if you ask it. Or something similarly naughty as a test.
dakower · 1791038183 · focus · HN ↗
call
api · 1791041999 · focus · HN ↗
I’m kinda surprised we are not mandated to call it America Intelligence. The initials would still be AI!
I’m personally still bummed basilisk.ai was taken. Looked for it as soon as I heard about that silly thing. Was going to make a Geocities style “shrine to Roko’s Basilisk.”
1. Alive-in-2025 · 1791048728 · focus · HN ↗
  That's a terrible suggestion that will no doubt be what happens
maerF0x0 · 1791046766 · focus · HN ↗
> Show me your tits
unfortunately this prevents me from sharing this at work
mococa · 1791048180 · focus · HN ↗
Our current world reminds me Idiocracy
egeozcan · 1791048668 · focus · HN ↗
I make this page: <a href="https://egeozcan.github.io/psuedo-00s-website-slop-edition/" rel="nofollow">https://egeozcan.github.io/psuedo-00s-website-slop-edition/
Then at the very same day HN has this.
This site is like my second brain.
daft_pink · 1791053767 · focus · HN ↗
did this come from the ideocracy universe?
bitcharmer · 1791061023 · focus · HN ↗
[dead]
gremlinunderway · 1791061131 · focus · HN ↗
Would love to know what prompts you used for this. Anytime I've ever tried to make an LLM create funny but satirical jokes it fails terribly and comes across cringey and try-hard. This one genuinely seems funny and absurd.
nobodydoesntlik · 1791065757 · focus · HN ↗
How much electrolytes does it have?
grg0 · 1791071658 · focus · HN ↗
I actually like the web design, so colourful. Beats any mainstream site riddled with ads.
Unfortunately, there are no hot singles in my fusion reactor.
rasengan0 · 1791087769 · focus · HN ↗
The ban hasn't even passed yet: <a href="https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artificial-Superintelligence-Act.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.sanders.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/Ban-Artifi...
No output to this prompt, not even an error: AI, opps nope SI is huuge. The best evar.We're gonna be rich right?
Needs a huggingface gguf

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.