Filed a compiler bug related to dwarf tables that screws up debugging and line of code coverage that they completely ignored, just because I mentioned that I had every LLM check it to confirm it's a bug, since all I know is what kcov and every coverage tool generates incorrect coverage data for my repo, for 100% certain.
The things you've quoted and your conclusion feel at odds. They just don't want AI contributions, and they, like a lot of the world, are bored of hearing about AI. Is it really too much to ask?
jabedude · · focus · HN ↗
abc42 · · focus · HN ↗
onlyrealcuzzo · · focus · HN ↗
bendmorris · · focus · HN ↗
unclad5968 · · focus · HN ↗
bendmorris · · focus · HN ↗
sigmar · · focus · HN ↗
>No LLMs for finding bugs.
>No talking about use of chatbot/LLM services.
I've said it before and I'll say it again- it's a cult that bans dissent
B4uler5 · · focus · HN ↗