Filed a compiler bug related to dwarf tables that screws up debugging and line of code coverage that they completely ignored, just because I mentioned that I had every LLM check it to confirm it's a bug, since all I know is what kcov and every coverage tool generates incorrect coverage data for my repo, for 100% certain.
If there's an edict that no one is allowed to bring up the topic, how can someone change this part of the code of conduct?
Asking non-rhetorically. It seems like one position "ai in any circumstance = bad" is being enforced. The commenter above didn't even understand why he was ignored.
jabedude · · focus · HN ↗
abc42 · · focus · HN ↗
onlyrealcuzzo · · focus · HN ↗
bendmorris · · focus · HN ↗
unclad5968 · · focus · HN ↗
bendmorris · · focus · HN ↗
sigmar · · focus · HN ↗
>No LLMs for finding bugs.
>No talking about use of chatbot/LLM services.
I've said it before and I'll say it again- it's a cult that bans dissent
alexrp · · focus · HN ↗
sigmar · · focus · HN ↗
Asking non-rhetorically. It seems like one position "ai in any circumstance = bad" is being enforced. The commenter above didn't even understand why he was ignored.
alexrp · · focus · HN ↗
To clarify, do you mean someone who isn't part of the core team?