This doesn't look like a particularly thriving platform: <a href="https://mastodon-analytics.com/#:~:text=Mastodon%20Active%20Users" rel="nofollow">https://mastodon-analytics.com/#:~:text=Mastodon%20Active%20...
They never wanted to capture every single user (have you seen the people on twitter? who would want to deal with that???)
They sought to carve out a targeted subset of users and did so successfully.
Life is about more than numbers, you know. Would you call your local steakhouse a failure because they're not putting up the numbers McDonalds does?
Can confirm, I'm one of those people. I mean I had an account on a Mastodon instance before that, but it became my primary social platform when Twitter got taken over.
non sequitur. The point is that "everyone" left Twitter is nonsense; no one said that no one did. Mastodon and Bluesky are alternatives, but Twitter is still dominant despite all the Nazis there.
blfr · · focus · HN ↗
VCFundedGenYer · · focus · HN ↗
murderfs · · focus · HN ↗
nvme0n1p1 · · focus · HN ↗
serf · · focus · HN ↗
mastodon has failed to capture the audience numbers of the products it sought to compete against, you can say that without criticizing the product.
ceejayoz · · focus · HN ↗
I really don't think that was ever the goal.
nvme0n1p1 · · focus · HN ↗
They sought to carve out a targeted subset of users and did so successfully.
Life is about more than numbers, you know. Would you call your local steakhouse a failure because they're not putting up the numbers McDonalds does?
0c3ca83 · · focus · HN ↗
pornel · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
ryukafalz · · focus · HN ↗
jibalt · · focus · HN ↗