‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

GrapheneOS has fixed the Android 17 QPR1 kernel performance regression

142 points · 102 comments · Cider9986

  1. mmooss · · focus · HN ↗

    [dead]

    1. palata · · focus · HN ↗
      > But they often choose to denigrate others, which is destructive, damages relationships

      It used to be like that (and to be fair, all the similar communities were contributing to the drama, not just GOS), I agree, but I genuinely feel like it has become a lot more professional lately. Like I haven't seen drama in... at least 6 months?

      Now I almost exclusively see them explain their technical decisions, which is very interesting.

      1. fsflover · · focus · HN ↗

        [dead]

        1. palata · · focus · HN ↗
          This is not drama, this is a technical opinion about their competitors. Happy to have Fairphone and /e/OS do it constructively as well. And I mean constructively. When the founder of /e/OS says "we are not one of those hardened systems for pedophiles", it is not constructive. If they said (I'm inventing here, not sure if they did): "The problem of GrapheneOS is that they only run on Pixels. We try to run on more phones in a best-effort basis", that would be valid.
          1. fsflover · · focus · HN ↗
            I agree that e&#x2F;OS&#x2F; weren&#x27;t constructive. However see this: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49947080">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49947080

            P.S. Flagging my comments, as the GrapheneOS fans do, is also far from constructive.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.