Thread

1. aboringusername · 1790975686 · focus · HN ↗

   It's concerning to hear about the disarray within the internal workings of Android, they've spoken quite a lot about this recently such as getting access to the code and having to make manual requests.

   I'm curious if there's any back up plan to an operating system used by billions. One would think, and hope, the EU would have an alternative ready to go at a moment's notice. Android is literally too big to fail, but I doubt the EU would be ready even though you could consider the failing of Android a national security emergency.

   I would like to know more about what's going on at Google that are causing these issues.

   1. palata · 1790976347 · focus · HN ↗

      I read a lot of comments like this, saying "we should have an alternative". And I agree that it would be really cool, BUT:

      AOSP and the Android SDK are open source. GrapheneOS is exactly an alternative to Google Android. Sure, Google could shut down the Play Store (but alternative stores exist), or destroy the Play Services (but even then, there is microG).

      I am happy that Google is still contributing to Android because they have a ton of money and many brilliant engineers, even though as a company it seems like it's somehow trying to burn it to the ground. But I am optimistic: it would be possible to build on top of the open source parts of Android if needed.

      1. 0xcde4c3db · 1790980149 · focus · HN ↗

         AOSP is open-source, but unlike Linux distros, AOSP per se doesn't really support any platform other than the Android emulator. To support real devices you need devicetree/firmware/drivers from a vendor. So it's concerning to see this move from Google, which is also the device vendor for all currently supported GrapheneOS devices.

         1. HybridStatAnim8 · 1791051559 · focus · HN ↗

            AOSP and its derivatives are linux distros.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.