‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

ICC judge on what U.S. sanctions mean for her and global courts

229 points · 173 comments · rbanffy

  1. hananova · · focus · HN ↗
    > One of the most serious examples is her health insurance. Prost receives coverage through AXA, the French company that provides insurance for the court. She says the company has refused to pay her claims even though it is not legally required to follow the U.S. sanctions.

    Then it is high time to make the company legally required not to follow the U.S. sanctions.

    1. JoBrad · · focus · HN ↗
      I don’t think this is the right option: if the target were legitimate, then we would welcome this level of impact. But if our (US) partner countries had the option to declare themselves exempt from applying individual sanctions, that seems like a good escape hatch.
      1. tmnvix · · focus · HN ↗
        If the target were legitimate then maybe the EU could stick to respecting legitimate sanctions.

        What many people seem to forget is that the US is in the habit of issuing unilateral sanctions. They are not legitimate in the way UN sanctions are.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.