ICC judge on what U.S. sanctions mean for her and global courts
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
ICC judge on what U.S. sanctions mean for her and global courts
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
msdz · · focus · HN ↗
For the U.S., because sanctioning an “unpleasant”, but in essence harmless individual (geopolitically speaking) is ridiculous. Falling victim to de-banking alone can really ruin one’s life.
And for the EU, because it once again showcases the dependence on U.S. systems for just about anything tech-related in everyday life and work.
nostrademons · · focus · HN ↗
Neutrality and objectivity may be a fiction, but it's one of the most useful fictions that have been invented in the last 500 years.
gradus_ad · · focus · HN ↗
Everything the US does and has done is aimed at defending itself and its interests, which includes its allies, as it should, and as it must.
The extent to which these actions appeared neutral was just a product of the overwhelming power of the US and overwhelming unity - by virtue of deference - prevalent among the Western powers during the Cold War, in the shadow of a common enemy.
Global neutral institutions exist on a fictional foundation that becomes thinner by the day. For substantial matters on which there is no rational answer, the only solution is the exercise of power.