‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

European payments groups join forces to challenge US dominance

63 points · 92 comments · vrganj

  1. rattlesnakedave · · focus · HN ↗

    [dead]

    1. hvb2 · · focus · HN ↗
      Why do you need a stablecoin if you can send the currency itself directly? If I have euros and the recipient wants euros, why would I need a stablecoin?

      Solution looking for a problem?

      1. Lio · · focus · HN ↗
        Not only is it a solution looking for a problem but it also opens up exchange fees and chance to be more easily robbed by North Korean government backed hackers looking to evade sanctions.

        <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.euronews.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;28&#x2F;north-korean-hackers-suspected-in-3328m-crypto-heist-as-it-leads-global-hacks" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.euronews.com&#x2F;2026&#x2F;09&#x2F;28&#x2F;north-korean-hackers-sus...

        1. iso1631 · · focus · HN ↗
          Or just someone with a $5 wrench

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;c6eq84eygz0qo" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.bbc.co.uk&#x2F;news&#x2F;articles&#x2F;c6eq84eygz0qo

        2. rattlesnakedave · · focus · HN ↗
          You have such a poor understanding of the subject, you don’t know what I’m proposing
      2. M95D · · focus · HN ↗
        Anonimity, at least until someone figures out who owns the wallet.
      3. rattlesnakedave · · focus · HN ↗
        This is a child’s understanding of international remittances
        1. hvb2 · · focus · HN ↗
          Care to elaborate?

          In Europe I can literally type someone&#x27;s IBAN and hit send, if arrives in seconds. So not sure what I need a stablecoin for.

          1. rattlesnakedave · · focus · HN ↗

            [dead]

    2. soco · · focus · HN ↗
      I need international payments maybe once a month. Sample size of one.
      1. M95D · · focus · HN ↗
        It&#x27;s not for you. It&#x27;s for companies. They&#x27;re implementing it first for person-to-person transactions just to test the system. Wouldn&#x27;t want a big corp to lose millions of euro because of a bug!
    3. KellyCriterion · · focus · HN ↗
      Some years ago I had to execute an international money transfer by SWIFT to someone in South America from our European bank:

      Unfortunately, I did a copy &amp; paste error by reusing the prior version and not overwriting all the data - I forgot to replace the bank account number, but name &amp; co was OK.

      The money didnt arrive, customer was getting angrier and angrier. Esp. since this transaction was related to crypto and back then was one of first BTC highflyertimes.

      A couple of days later I received a message from the bank, asking for having a quick call. In the meantime, they had called the customer to investigate even more.

      Quickly we found out that it was just my mistake by copying &amp; re-using the form. I sent them a SWIFT message confirming what was discussed and that the right account number is indeed 123 instead of 678.

      In the end, all of us were happy, even with a little delay.

      Im 100% sure that this type of cooperation would never work on any of these crypto stacks :-))

      1. rattlesnakedave · · focus · HN ↗
        You have such a simplistic read on the situation, and are so far behind on the space I’m not sure an explanation of what I’m proposing is possible.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.