‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Our Project Suncatcher prototype satellite is in orbit

80 points · 77 comments · pantalaimon

  1. derriz · · focus · HN ↗
    Capacity factor of orbital solar PV panel: 97%

    Capacity factor of terrestrial solar panel: 23%

    Retail cost per watt for terrestrial panel: under 45c

    Manufacturing cost per watt of space grade solar panel: up to $450

    Annual performance degradation of terrestrial solar panel: under 0.5%

    That of space-grade solar panel: up to 2%

    Life span of terrestrial panel: about 2x that of space panel.

    Total difference in cost per watt feeding a DC load in space vs on land: about x400

    And that's ignoring launch costs. It makes absolutely zero sense. And given the scale of production and investment in manufacturing, terrestrial is likely to stretch even further ahead in the cost stakes.

    1. testdelacc1 · · focus · HN ↗
      Can I just compare this to buying some slightly remote land, building one small nuclear reactor on it and offering free electricity to everyone in a wide radius of the plant/datacenter?

      Someone else said the facility needs 370MW. Great, because SMR designs provide 470MW. That’s 100MW excess, given for free to locals to entice them to support the project. That can power 40k homes, easily. People object to these projects partly because their bills go up? Cool, those bills disappear now.

      But no, I guess we’re creating massive arrays in space and polluting the night sky forever.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.