‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Our Project Suncatcher prototype satellite is in orbit

80 points · 77 comments · pantalaimon

  1. derriz · · focus · HN ↗
    Capacity factor of orbital solar PV panel: 97%

    Capacity factor of terrestrial solar panel: 23%

    Retail cost per watt for terrestrial panel: under 45c

    Manufacturing cost per watt of space grade solar panel: up to $450

    Annual performance degradation of terrestrial solar panel: under 0.5%

    That of space-grade solar panel: up to 2%

    Life span of terrestrial panel: about 2x that of space panel.

    Total difference in cost per watt feeding a DC load in space vs on land: about x400

    And that's ignoring launch costs. It makes absolutely zero sense. And given the scale of production and investment in manufacturing, terrestrial is likely to stretch even further ahead in the cost stakes.

    1. 0cf8612b2e1e · · focus · HN ↗
      Just on a mass basis it falls apart.

      Best cost to orbit I am seeing is $1500/kg. A GPU rack is ~1500kg. Let’s imagine you can take a terrestrial data center rack, no scaffolding, solar panels, radiators, radios, propellant, or propulsion. Fly it into orbit, kick it out the airlock, and let it work through magic. That’s $2.2 million to get into position.

      Industrial power rates are cheap, say $.10/kwh, but pretend you sign terrible deals, and it costs you $.30/kwh to run and cool a terrestrial GPU rack. A 150kw unit will then be (150x24x365x.3) =$394k/year.

      You can operate the terrestrial version for 5.7 years before the two hit parity.

      1. LunaSea · · focus · HN ↗
        $1500 / kg seems incredibly low considering that launching a simple 1U cube sat costs roughly $200,000.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.