Thread

1. Jeeetendra · 1790938684 · focus · HN ↗

   nice to see a proper open-source multitrack editor that isn't tied to one OS. how does latency hold up with lots of tracks?

   1. vltmrkls · 1790943808 · focus · HN ↗

      i have not benchmarked the playback yet. the performance should be industry standard an not a concern.

      1. vltmrkls · 1790946595 · focus · HN ↗

         the audio callback is lock free and the dsp is vectorised. i think you can expect very good performance. there is a dsp load meter implemented that displays spikes in the load. anyways... adding benchmarks is in my backlog.

         1. vltmrkls · 1790949105 · focus · HN ↗

            [dead]

      2. Jeeetendra · 1791129858 · focus · HN ↗

         the dsp meter sounds useful - i'd still be curious to see track-count and buffer-size benchmarks when you get to them.
   2. hack1312 · 1790946689 · focus · HN ↗

      is audacity not multitrack?

      1. vltmrkls · 1790950022 · focus · HN ↗

         let's hope audacity and audionaut will happily co-exist and learn form each other.
      2. whywhywhywhy · 1790954103 · focus · HN ↗

         Yeah but it’s not very good, crashes often and has been acquired by a company pushing some online subscription
      3. Jeeetendra · 1791129863 · focus · HN ↗

         you're right, audacity is multitrack too - i wasn't trying to imply this was the first one.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.