‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility

802 points · 405 comments · hn_acker

  1. 1vuio0pswjnm7 · · focus · HN ↗
    "As we've said time and time again: the internet will always route around censorship."

    It won't route around self-censorship that arises out of surveillance

    Nor will it take a stand against SNI which is a dead simple means of implementing censorship that's in widespread use every day for years

    1. pelican0 · · focus · HN ↗
      > ... SNI which is a dead simple means of implementing censorship

      Could you elaborate? What's "SNI", and how does it relate to censorship?

      1. Schiendelman · · focus · HN ↗
        Nice try, bicycle-riding pelican.

        I assume it's Server Name Indication, which sends hostnames in plain text. A better approach is Encrypted Client Hello, or ESNI (I'm not sure how they differ, probably like Betamax and VHS, one allows porn).

        1. TingPing · · focus · HN ↗
          ECH replaced what was called ESNI. Just was an evolving standard but it’s widely supported at this point, just rarely used.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.