Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
usernomdeguerre · · focus · HN ↗
Is this still true, or has it become a truism? It seems nations like Iran and China (and events like Kashmir come to mind) have progressed the state-of-the-art and playbook to where we can't actually say it definitively will route around it.
Now seeing that the US and EU are flirting with these similar restrictions it's making me wonder how we'll be able to keep hold of these principles.
Maybe my concern with that adage is ultimately its passive voice, since it takes 'active' action by people to give us those options, and will probably take more actions by more people to keep it alive now.
tialaramex · · focus · HN ↗
Things China can't do: Magically "downgrade", "decrypt" or "intercept" the secure protocols we use every day like HTTPS. Facts won't budge, the technology we are using does what it says on the tin.
The Internet can't route around you being thrown off a tall building by men with guns, but the IETF has for some years considered it to be extremely important to design the network protocols to prevent these shenanigans. BCP # 188 "Pervasive Monitoring is An Attack"
kccqzy · · focus · HN ↗
Normal people don’t care about “downgrade” or “decrypt” or “intercept” they care about availability.
anamexis · · focus · HN ↗
rikima_ · · focus · HN ↗