Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
HiPhish · · focus · HN ↗
How does legislation work in the US? How can an impossible law pass? Is it just some boomer stomping his feet like a toddler "I know what I want, and I want it now" without consulting any technical experts, and then private organizations like the EFF and courts have to clean up the mess?
eschaton · · focus · HN ↗
HiPhish · · focus · HN ↗
dspillett · · focus · HN ↗
And that often comes down to people realising that they need to engage those experts. Instead many just assume "it makes sense to me, with the thinking I've done about it" means that it definitely actualy makes sense.
Also sometimes the very cynical view is true: people know technical experts will pick holes in something, so they find a way to rush it through quickly to not allow the chance for that. Sometimes they are quite honest about this with arguments based in "not letting perfect be the enemy of good". Once a rule is in place it then becomes someone else's problem to undo it, or at least fix the technical problems in-place. Meanwhile those that got it through get credit from those who agree with the emotive argument, and also don't care about the technical details & accidental implications, credit that they can try use to further the cause or their career.