‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility

802 points · 405 comments · hn_acker

  1. forshaper · · focus · HN ↗
    Can someone explain why it wouldn't work to have porn companies use only certain domains, and filter based on those domains, if people are so intent on blocking it?
    1. petcat · · focus · HN ↗
      The US Congress evaluated [1] the legality of forcing adult websites onto certain TLDs in the 2000s and it was determined to be legally ambiguous and would almost certainly face substantial 1st amendment challenges. So they didn't pursue it.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.everycrsreport.com&#x2F;files&#x2F;20080714_RL33224_1e6b938ac811728e431489084d35dc26e4e8c720.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.everycrsreport.com&#x2F;files&#x2F;20080714_RL33224_1e6b93...

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.