‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Court agrees with EFF: Utah's VPN law demands a technical impossibility

802 points · 405 comments · hn_acker

  1. SoftTalker · · focus · HN ↗
    > platforms are left with an impossible choice: completely block all VPN traffic nationwide or withdraw access from Utah entirely

    Is it even possible to reliably know that a connection is from a VPN? Anyone can proxy through a random hosting provider.

    1. not_a_bot_4sho · · focus · HN ↗
      Kinda.

      I use VPN most of the time. My work requires it, and I like Mozilla VPN for personal privacy. (Note: it has ad blocking DNS built in which is nice!)

      I occasionally get blocked by websites or services, especially streaming apps, if I'm on VPN. I suspect they're just looking out for Amazon/Microsoft/etc IP address blocks. It's very annoying

      1. Aurornis · · focus · HN ↗
        That's not the same. You get blocked because the IP address you're coming from is associated with a VPN list, not because they're analyzing the traffic in detail.

        The simplest methods block known datacenter IP ranges like you thought. More will score it based on several heuristics and a reputation over time. If you get 100 different users connecting from a single IP, it's probably not someone's home internet connection.

        1. a4isms · · focus · HN ↗
          > If you get 100 different users connecting from a single IP, it's probably not someone's home internet connection.

          Or, their so-called "smart" TV is acting as a proxy without their informed consent.

          1. someonebaggy · · focus · HN ↗
            One of the positive side effects of smart TV proxies: IP addresses become useless information.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.