Thread

1. vatsachak · 1790971865 · focus · HN ↗

   The idea is great but the websites shown as examples are clearly made by AI because they make no sense.

   Current AI is NOT going to replace web devs or coders because it cannot tabula rasa make human sense. I suspect the reverse with a Jevons thingy happening

   1. tripleee · 1790972581 · focus · HN ↗

      If you have a product manager directing the AI (instead of developers) to build what they want then it will make sense.

      1. vatsachak · 1790973532 · focus · HN ↗

         But then you quickly have tech debt build up because current LLMs cant plan over long scales

         1. tripleee · 1790974155 · focus · HN ↗

            They don't do it by default all the time but if prompted to they're pretty good at designing and refactoring code

            I'm increasingly finding my job is just making sure they don't go off the rails, and if they do it's a small effort of getting them back on track

            1. vatsachak · 1790975256 · focus · HN ↗

               I think you're underestimating your own role in making sure they are not going off the rails haha

               1. tripleee · 1790978074 · focus · HN ↗

                  yeah, I hope you're right. I find it hard to imagine how non or mildly-technical people would use it differently

                  1. vatsachak · 1790978947 · focus · HN ↗

                     Stuff like a wrapper over Plaid and some OCR is definitely dead for sure.

                     But currently they can't manage a vending machine as good as human, so I doubt they have our centuries long planning ability

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.