Thread

1. thih9 · 1790910606 · focus · HN ↗

   I’m surprised how few of them support dark mode.

   IMHO today dark mode support is part of reasonable defaults.

   1. etatester · 1790914026 · focus · HN ↗

      I think they're just really old and not supported by anyone.
   2. TZubiri · 1790914934 · focus · HN ↗

      Wrote some css from scratch the other day, 7 lines and I was done, line 8 are 9 were dark mode support integrated with OS setting.

      It's not that complex, there's some minimal frameworks here with 10kB of css code, it's ironic.

   3. small_scombrus · 1790915526 · focus · HN ↗

      It's honestly horrifying how many website just don't bother.

      Like w3, the makers of the web accessibility checklist have a flash-bang of a website and noone appears to have cared enough to fix it

      1. Yokohiii · 1790934282 · focus · HN ↗

         What are the reasons why you want dark mode so badly?

         1. testerius · 1790949994 · focus · HN ↗

            Because there are different people - many of them like using dark mode.
         2. kdkekxjjexnek · 1790951230 · focus · HN ↗

            I think the “flash bang” comment gives you a pretty good, convincing idea of why this is sorely needed.
         3. nottorp · 1790951409 · focus · HN ↗

            To take advantage of oled and local dimming displays, for example.

            Thank you for not caring about my battery.

         4. HappMacDonald · 1791101871 · focus · HN ↗

            Not OP but I have an unusual investment in preventing my eyeballs from being stabbed repeatedly until they bleed.
   4. dantesays · 1790959903 · focus · HN ↗

      [dead]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.