I am genuinely starting to fear an almost universal dumbing down of humanity as a result of AI. It feels like so many people have just stopped caring about what they do or what they create. They no longer believe they need to know what they are doing or care about the results. The machines will do the knowing and caring for them. Or they won't - but what they produce without knowing or caring will be good enough to tick whatever boxes are necessary so it doesn't matter.
Over the years I have enjoyed many deep and interesting technical discussions online - both here on HN and elsewhere. I can't help feeling that those discussions have also all but disappeared over the past few months - alongside high quality free material that some experts have kindly given away but increasingly no longer do. I rarely find myself contributing any more because there is little on any of my usual online hangouts that is interesting enough to spark a deep technical discussion any more. It's 90% AI stuff - either written about AI or (usually poorly) written by AI - and most of the discussions that do initially catch my interest at all seem to end being very negative and depressing. (I appreciate the irony that I'm perpetuating that cycle right now. Looking through my relatively sparse recent contributions to HN is actually quite depressing. Although at least I actually am getting out more!)
I wouldn't mind so much if I believed the hype about the benefits of AI-generated work and thought that overall this period would be a net win for humanity. Unfortunately I don't really believe that. I fear the LLM era will eventually be remembered for producing tools that could do average/routine tasks quickly and to an acceptable standard but that were actually used to (try to) do good/innovative tasks with substandard results. But by the time enough decision-makers realise this it might be too late and the damage might already be done and hard to reverse.
The corporations ever growing size is what scares me the most. Why care when you are a replaceable cog in a massive sprawling machine? Why care when your effort is not particularly seen or rewarded?
People's jobs are no longer something that connects us to other people around us, or the world at large. And these massive orgs are caring less and less about their people.
I do think AI compounds this. Yes. But also, what parts of the world are actively seeking involvement, are dynamic places with apparent rife potential? The world just doesn't care, doesn't have the engagement points it did.
Tech in particular has really lost its luster as a dynamic place. Tech has gotten much more mature, much more industrial scale & less new & creative.
And then: the titans have consistently eaten all the younger children. The big companies swallow up all the interesting new places. The monoculture of these ultra massive ultra wealthy titans, who've been doing the same intermediation enshittification plays for decades now, is not exciting, is not a vibrant thing: it's tiresome to the world to endure these titans, rather than interesting and thrilling a scene to be a part of.
Silhouette · · focus · HN ↗
Over the years I have enjoyed many deep and interesting technical discussions online - both here on HN and elsewhere. I can't help feeling that those discussions have also all but disappeared over the past few months - alongside high quality free material that some experts have kindly given away but increasingly no longer do. I rarely find myself contributing any more because there is little on any of my usual online hangouts that is interesting enough to spark a deep technical discussion any more. It's 90% AI stuff - either written about AI or (usually poorly) written by AI - and most of the discussions that do initially catch my interest at all seem to end being very negative and depressing. (I appreciate the irony that I'm perpetuating that cycle right now. Looking through my relatively sparse recent contributions to HN is actually quite depressing. Although at least I actually am getting out more!)
I wouldn't mind so much if I believed the hype about the benefits of AI-generated work and thought that overall this period would be a net win for humanity. Unfortunately I don't really believe that. I fear the LLM era will eventually be remembered for producing tools that could do average/routine tasks quickly and to an acceptable standard but that were actually used to (try to) do good/innovative tasks with substandard results. But by the time enough decision-makers realise this it might be too late and the damage might already be done and hard to reverse.
jauntywundrkind · · focus · HN ↗
The corporations ever growing size is what scares me the most. Why care when you are a replaceable cog in a massive sprawling machine? Why care when your effort is not particularly seen or rewarded?
People's jobs are no longer something that connects us to other people around us, or the world at large. And these massive orgs are caring less and less about their people.
I do think AI compounds this. Yes. But also, what parts of the world are actively seeking involvement, are dynamic places with apparent rife potential? The world just doesn't care, doesn't have the engagement points it did.
Tech in particular has really lost its luster as a dynamic place. Tech has gotten much more mature, much more industrial scale & less new & creative.
And then: the titans have consistently eaten all the younger children. The big companies swallow up all the interesting new places. The monoculture of these ultra massive ultra wealthy titans, who've been doing the same intermediation enshittification plays for decades now, is not exciting, is not a vibrant thing: it's tiresome to the world to endure these titans, rather than interesting and thrilling a scene to be a part of.