Thread

1. ourmandave · 1790888668 · focus · HN ↗

   Ha ha, you fools! No one is collecting my data from my 22-year-old Scion while I drive past Flock cameras every day.

   Wait...

   1. eckelhesten · 1790889602 · focus · HN ↗

      There’s “oh he’s at the grocery store” data,

      and then there’s “he’s driving in a way we don’t like, let’s make him pay more for his insurance” data.

      1. SoftTalker · 1790895447 · focus · HN ↗

         Well if you're driving dangerously why shouldn't you pay more?

         1. hansvm · 1790895849 · focus · HN ↗

            Part of the problem is it just gets shoved into a model without enough data support. So I hit the gas hard merging onto the freeway? Of course; your brakes are much more powerful than your throttle if you need to take evasive action, and merging onto the freeway at 50mph is dangerous. The model just sees that you like keeping your foot on the gas from time to time. To keep your rates low you have to drive more dangerously, and that's not the sort of incentive structure I like to participate in.

            1. SoftTalker · 1790899660 · focus · HN ↗

               You generally don't need to hit the gas hard to merge onto a freeway, you need to accelerate evenly on the ramp and be at 65-70 by the time you get to the merge point, being aware of traffic and where the gap is that you're going to merge into, and hitting it.

               And occasionally having to hit the gas or brake hard is not going to raise your rate. They look for more of a pattern than that. If you're always braking hard and then accellerating hard, surging and changing lanes, consistently speeding, etc. that's going to be the trigger and what do you know, that's also the kind of driving that causes crashes.

               1. [deleted] · 1790970641 · focus · HN ↗

                  [deleted]

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.