I don't really understand the criteria for when something is 'proven' to the Pi team. Jev and the like took off less than a month ago, but MCP has been growing for nearly 2 years, and it only gets support now?
Pi felt nice when I used it, and I do value keeping things minimal, but I just find the criteria very uneven.
I agree. I don't necessarily "trust" Anthropic and OpenAI when it comes to CC/Codex respectively, but I respect that they have immense internal resources and telemetry to be able to understand what features move the needle and nudge traces in the right direction. I don't understand how non-labs judge feature inclusion? Just vibes?
hhh · · focus · HN ↗
Pi felt nice when I used it, and I do value keeping things minimal, but I just find the criteria very uneven.
extr · · focus · HN ↗
Aperocky · · focus · HN ↗
If there's anything that I can conclude about Anthropics idea of how a LLM should speak. Vibes would have been an euphemism