‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Pi 1.0

1684 points · 602 comments · sergiotapia

  1. hhh · · focus · HN ↗
    I don't really understand the criteria for when something is 'proven' to the Pi team. Jev and the like took off less than a month ago, but MCP has been growing for nearly 2 years, and it only gets support now?

    Pi felt nice when I used it, and I do value keeping things minimal, but I just find the criteria very uneven.

    1. alexhans · · focus · HN ↗
      It was already very good and has been used/battle tested by many us for a long time.

      Some tools used to be 0.x for ages and, in this case, the 1.0 signals they're happy enough and allows them to promote things in a better way.

      This (edit the durable part) is I guess the natural evolution of playing around building temporal like things for a need that many have.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.