‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Anatomy of a Lean proof for software engineers

128 points · 76 comments · abiro

  1. thom · · focus · HN ↗
    So this is all great, but given that we’re being asked to accept 500k+ line Lean proofs that check but could easily have major semantic errors hidden in them, what’s the plan? These seem like uniquely fragile software artifacts, despite the excellent and robust promises made by the runtime.
    1. whateverboat · · focus · HN ↗
      Runtime robustness is all you need though.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.