Vote on which of Hacker News' challenges for AI have been met
Thread
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
Vote on which of Hacker News' challenges for AI have been met
Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.
hatthew · · focus · HN ↗
Another thing to note is that the (presumably AI-generated) summary of my challenge does not accurately represent what I wrote, listing only half the things I said and saying "or" rather than "and".
intelkishan · · focus · HN ↗
hatthew · · focus · HN ↗
I didn't really design a comprehensive test, just listed a few examples of the sort of thing I imagine when I head the name "humanity's last exam". So take it with a grain of salt.
dingdongditchme · · focus · HN ↗
1. "improve uniteds' plane shedule" -> the word "improve" does a lot of heavy lifting there..
2. Turing test for me is solved: "AI expert" is just moving the goal posts imho. The original turing test to my knowledge is about passing notes under a door. Obviously, llms can't communicate via hand-written notes and if that is the bar it will take a long time (or a specifically designed hand-writting machine) to really do this. As far as how much writing back and forth you can do it is clear that turing test is beat: I am wondering often enough on text sent to me from colleagues if it is generated, the same goes for comments here or any ol' website. In a standard llm session I don't really communicate differently than with a human and would not be able to tell the difference in an hour texting session or so. Of course if I ask it to count words or do something ridiculous I can find sus it out; but for all intents and purposes the chat-bot exists.
lovich · · focus · HN ↗
Can’t imagine it’d be too much work to hook up and LLMs output to one.
<a href="https://www.amazon.com/s?k=handwriting+machine+for+letters" rel="nofollow">https://www.amazon.com/s?k=handwriting+machine+for+letters