Thread

Vote on which of Hacker News' challenges for AI have been met

202 points · 271 comments · stabbles

bmenrigh · 1790878994 · focus · HN ↗
At least 1/3rd of these predictions aren't clear enough to determine exactly what is being claimed/predicted. Even after reading the full comment multiple times, on a lot of them I couldn't tell where the author had set the goalposts well enough to say whether we've crossed it or not.
1. Buttons840 · 1790942692 · focus · HN ↗
  Yes. One of my comments is in there [0] and is basically:
  "AI still hasn't passed a proper Turing test. A proper Turing test is 1 hour or more. Has any AI passed it?"
  How do you answer that? "'Yes', AI has NOT passed a proper Turing test", or "'Yes', AI has passed a proper Turing test".
  My comment doesn't actually make any prediction to judge, it's just an observation and an argument.
  [0]: <a href="https://stoppels.ch/goalposts/?c=38757769" rel="nofollow">https://stoppels.ch/goalposts/?c=38757769
  1. Kim_Bruning · 1790944201 · focus · HN ↗
    A problem with turing tests is that people now recognize the Ideolects of several of the major models, so now it's like "Ah, you're a load bearing Claude" (though several other models and humans now talk like that too, which is something I need to sit with :-P )

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.