Thread

Vote on which of Hacker News' challenges for AI have been met

202 points · 271 comments · stabbles

joegibbs · 1790897129 · focus · HN ↗
There's one of mine in there where I predicted in 2023 that it would be 20 years until AI would be reliably able to entirely build and deploy arbitrary applications from a prompt. I was off by about 18 years on that one!
1. ASalazarMX · 1790898900 · focus · HN ↗
  One challenge of mine is a self-hosted AI doing my full tax return, without errors that would get me in trouble. Bonus points if it exploits legal loopholes.
  I want AI to replace me in my chores, not in my enjoyable activities.
  1. tehjoker · 1790900377 · focus · HN ↗
    That particular one is solved in other countries. The tax authority just sends you a bill and you text yes or no. Only people with very complex situations need to file.
    They don't do this in this country because (a) it's a political project to make people to sympathize with the rich by feeling their pain (b) it's a great scheme for legalized corruption by creating incentives to build companies around a fake problem.
    avadodin · 1790900836 · focus · HN ↗
    Literally everything could be derived automatically by the government in current year so filing taxes feels like entrapment, but I like that idea.
    They not only do that —saving you so many worries— but then you get to be medieval about it and say: no, I challenge the tax authority to a duel.
    twoodfin · 1790906281 · focus · HN ↗
    Literally everything could be derived automatically by the government in current year…
    The Earned Income Tax Credit is one of the most important transfers embedded in the tax code. It provides about $70B to low-income workers every year.
    Take a look at the eligibility criteria:
    <a href="https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/individuals/earned-income-tax-credit/who-qualifies-for-the-earned-income-tax-credit-eitc" rel="nofollow">https://www.irs.gov/credits-deductions/individuals/earned-in...
    You can claim the EITC if you are married, not filing a joint return, had a qualifying child who lived with you for more than half of the tax year and either of the following apply.
    - You lived apart from your spouse for the last 6 months of tax year, or
    - You were legally separated according to your state law under a written separation agreement, or a decree of separate maintenance and you didn't live in the same household as your spouse at the end of the tax year.
    …
    You can claim the head of household filing status if you're not married, had a qualifying child living with you more than half the year, and you paid more than half the costs of keeping up your home.
    No, the government can’t derive this all “automatically”.
    TheDong · 1790912410 · focus · HN ↗
    In more civilized countries, you file your current address and all change of address forms with the government, you register any separation agreements with the government, etc.
    The government absolutely should know enough to apply this reasonably accurately, and things that they can't correctly derive (like 'paid more than half the costs of keeping up the home') should simply not be part of tax law, or should be a checkbox when registering your address of "I am head of household" so the government knows.
    The US government can't derive all this, but they should update it so they can.
    Heck, with the NSA's hooks into banks and cell phone companies, there's a non-zero chance they actually could derive this all now if they wanted.
    bryanrasmussen · 1790919754 · focus · HN ↗
    >and things that they can't correctly derive (like 'paid more than half the costs of keeping up the home')
    In most situations where you paid significantly more than half deriving this information should be easy.
    Obviously edge cases where someone paid 55% would not be easily derived, but probably most people wouldn't care too much about that.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.