Complexity has to play a role, google chrome has more LOC than windows XP... At this point everything is a pile of piles of shit built on top of a gigantic pile of shit.
Today I ran out of ram, the "teams" desktop app was taking 2 gigs just standing there doing nothing, you can run four whole windows Xp on the same amount of ram, comfortably. My inactive chatgpt chrome tab alone was taking 900mb
sedan_baklazhan · · focus · HN ↗
For some reasons I can’t stop thinking about “AI”.
233mhz · · focus · HN ↗
Today I ran out of ram, the "teams" desktop app was taking 2 gigs just standing there doing nothing, you can run four whole windows Xp on the same amount of ram, comfortably. My inactive chatgpt chrome tab alone was taking 900mb
ttoinou · · focus · HN ↗
And the web is the most advanced and open OS in the world. That all those features can be packaged into a 100MB binary is magic
nullpoint420 · · focus · HN ↗
RunSet · · focus · HN ↗
By being a poorly-behaved process until you are caught red-handed.
<a href="https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/07/why-google-took-years-to-address-a-battery-draining-bug-in-chrome/" rel="nofollow">https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2014/07/why-google-took-year...
nullpoint420 · · focus · HN ↗
Chrome has gone through almost two rewrites of their core rendering stack since then. It's impressive work.
Although this itself is outdated, I remember enjoying "Life of a Pixel"[0] back when it came out.
[0] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-J-tbAlFic" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-J-tbAlFic