‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Git 3.0's upcoming SHA-256 default will be a costly mistake

570 points · 536 comments · chmaynard

  1. quotemstr · · focus · HN ↗
    Would the author feel the same if git had used MD5 instead of SHA-1?
    1. happytoexplain · · focus · HN ↗
      They address this very theoretical. In short: Yes. Which makes sense if you don't treat the hash as a form of security against malice, especially in the case of attacks that are already impractical, which is the entire thrust of the article.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.