Thread

1. manlymuppet · 1790875177 · focus · HN ↗

   Am I hearing this right, that they made a decision model based on Typesafe's new paradigm, and actually made a model better than Jev based on Typesafe's own ranking?

   And it's only been a few weeks.

   1. TeMPOraL · 1790876066 · focus · HN ↗

      It's not a "new paradigm", it's a low-hanging fruit that's been lying around for years; Typesafe were the first to bother to stop and pick it up, and market the shit out of it. But it was still a low-hanging fruit.

      There are many, many of those left around, because AI frontier is moving forward so fast, everyone is racing ahead. Which is why I laugh when people say AI is not transformative and LLMs are a dead end (and my favorite, "what are we going to do with all those GPUs when the bubble pops?"). Even if SOTA LLMs hit a hard capability limit tomorrow and never advanced again, there's a good decade of growth and advancement to be extracted just from all the low-hanging fruits that were left unpicked along the way.

      1. outofpaper · 1790924375 · focus · HN ↗

         Yup, one output token, and read the logprobs of the posible tokens that could have been thos 1st token. Plenty of systems already do this; Typesafe's fundraising and marketing just made it visible.

         Good to see interest broadening beyond "just extend thinking." More approaches in the toolbox means fewer problems get treated as nails.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.