‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Red Hat being phased out of existence?

213 points · 143 comments · amcclure

  1. pelcg · · focus · HN ↗
    Why though? Isn’t RHEL fully supported and used heavily in production?
    1. mmh0000 · · focus · HN ↗
      As a Senior Engineering Manager, I can tell you that, per my directive, we've actively standardized on Rocky Linux. We're moving away from everything else, including RHEL.

      I was a long-time RHCX (Red Hat Certified Examiner). From around 2005 to 2015. When IBM bought Red Hat, I saw the writing on the wall, but I was optimistic it might be a Good Thing™. It wasn't a good thing. Red Hat has been pretty stagnant, as the article says. RH is 90% AI slop today. They'll live on as a brand for a long time, but from a technical perspective, they don't have much to offer.

      In the early 2000s, I recommended paying for RH because their technical support was amazing. Now, it's mostly 3rd-party contractors who know less than what you can find with a Google search. Unless you are extremely lucky, you never get to talk to actual RH engineers anymore.

      I really like the Red Hat ecosystem and system design. However, I feel like they've petered out and won't recover from where they're headed. (I say, as I type this on my personal laptop running Fedora).

      TL;DR: RH went from a super-nerd company to coasting on its former success.

      1. m4rtink · · focus · HN ↗
        >we've actively standardized on Rocky Linux

        Tell me, where do the source bits from Rocky Linux come from ? ;-)

        1. mmh0000 · · focus · HN ↗
          Duh. I said in my first post: I like the RH ecosystem. I do not like RH corporate.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.