‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

OKI Develops 124-Layer PCB Technology

54 points · 28 comments · luu

  1. geerlingguy · · focus · HN ↗
    So... at what point does someone re-create a 386 or 6501 but using only a motherboard, with no discrete circuits?
    1. Cieric · · focus · HN ↗
      Shouldn't that have already been do-able? I know the The MOnSter 6502 is a thing. The 386 I have no idea about though, that's to far out of my wheel house.

      <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;monster6502.com&#x2F;" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;monster6502.com&#x2F;

      1. duskwuff · · focus · HN ↗
        A replica 386 would be impractically large - it&#x27;s got around 275k transistors, compared to the 3.5k in the 6502. At the same scale as the MOnSter 6502, that&#x27;d be about a hundred square feet of PCB.

        The number of layers isn&#x27;t even remotely close to being a constraint. The real i386DX was manufactured on a process which only supported two metal layers, and a PCB version isn&#x27;t subject to the same constraints as silicon.

        1. snek_case · · focus · HN ↗
          The ARM1 was a 32-bit CPU and it only had about 25K transistors so that one might be fair game if you can bring the components a little bit closer together, but you don&#x27;t need a fancy PCB for that, and I guess the clock speed would need to be very slow if it&#x27;s several square feet in size.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.