‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Turbo Haskell

213 points · 62 comments · pjmlp

  1. dzonga · · focus · HN ↗
    now that there's all the rage about agentic coding - & languages don't matter - why r people not migrating to more less error prone languages like Haskell ?
    1. epgui · · focus · HN ↗
      Anecdotally, I’ve found Claude-generated Haskell code to be almost as bad (hard to read) as Claude-generated python.

      I have no doubt the haskell compiles… but when it comes from an LLM it reads like nonsensical code soup.

      Claude-generated Clojure seems a lot better.

      1. tikhonj · · focus · HN ↗
        I've had much better experiences with Haskell (well, mostly PureScript for now) than Python, but that might be because I am very hands-on with the design of the core types and abstractions I'm working with.

        Having an effect system so that Claude is not tempted to throw in side-effects everywhere helps a lot too!

        1. epgui · · focus · HN ↗
          Yes, undoubtedly.

          (For further context, I was comparing essentially vibe code across languages. Vibe-coded Clojure stood out as much less unpalatable than anything else I tried.)

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.