‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

An AI sovereign wealth fund isn't progressive – it's techno-imperialism

90 points · 65 comments · Anon84

  1. velcrovan · · focus · HN ↗
    I can’t read the article. Do they explain how it’s more imperialist than what we have now?

    Using capital ownership to distribute the proceeds of an industry whose raw material was the creative output of everyone everywhere … seems like the neatest and most obvious possible solution to AI displacement and provenance. But I can see how it might make a few dozen people less likely to be billionaires.

    1. StableAlkyne · · focus · HN ↗
      AI;DR* they want to build data centers in other countries that are less able to resist their construction. This consumes water and electricity of the host county. The central thesis is that if the less-than-willing exploitation of foreign resources for the enrichment of the more powerful country is imperialism, then this is a form of imperialism.

      * The clunky turns of phrase and jarring introduction of analogies reads strongly of Claude to me, at least

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.