Thread

1. ocd · 1790861971 · focus · HN ↗

   I'm not a business guy, but I think I would be very worried if I created any opening (even on the very long term) for competition to justify itself being built up to meet demand (or national security requirements of other countries) on an industry I mostly control, because I prioritized extremely high prices for a few years that might have the effect of changing the arithmetic for potential competitors that wouldn't have done it before.

   It makes me consider whether there would be retaliation in later years against the US intellectual property system in countries other than China. While RAM is a tangible product, the areas it serves aren't really.

   1. segmondy · 1790863958 · focus · HN ↗

      Or it just be that demand really does seriously exceed supply. It's not fast to bring supply online, it's costly and risky to do so if the demand will not be sustained for a long time. IMO, there's no conspiracy. I have been telling folks for the last 3 years that the price of AI compute is not coming down for a good 5+ years. Possibly 10 years too. Every human in the world will need AI, the same way we all got on the internet and then mobile. However, outside of humans, for every human there's going to be ten or hundreds of agents also all demanding compute.

      1. HarHarVeryFunny · 1790869392 · focus · HN ↗

         > I have been telling folks for the last 3 years that the price of AI compute

         What does that even mean ?

         The cost of AI itself (tokens/$ for a given level of intelligence) has been falling rapidly, and shows no sign of stopping.

         1. ShinyLeftPad · 1790871154 · focus · HN ↗

            they operate at a loss (they pretend to profit by excluding key costs in financial reports). they won't do it forever.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.