‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant

411 points · 378 comments · rbanffy

  1. TrackerFF · · focus · HN ↗
    Yeah, people are unfortunately not informed on just how much power border agents wield. Not only in the US, but in many (most I'd believe) other countries, too. I've worked on cases (intel side) where the law-enforcement side would just wait for the surveillance objects to cross the border, as that's where they could do most data collection with the least hassle.

    If for whatever reason you think you're being investigated or surveilled (who knows for what these days, could be enough to just associate with the various protest groups / orgs), you can just assume that the border will be where they'll try to clone / download your data (phones, laptops, whatever)

    1. kypro · · focus · HN ↗
      UK is crazy for this. Border police can detain anyone they like for literally no reason and if they do you have no right to lawyer or no right to silence. Your devices can also be taken and you must hand over any passwords.

      I know the UK is an authoritarian state and not really comparable to the US, but as a Brit it's kinda weird hearing Americans complain about flock cameras and arbitrary border searches – these are common place things in the UK and no one cares (well, apart from me and maybe one or two others).

      1. seanhunter · · focus · HN ↗
        That is not true. The specific powers of arrest and detention by UK border force were set out in this freedom of information response here <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.whatdotheyknow.com&#x2F;request&#x2F;uk_border_force_powers_of_arrest&#x2F;response&#x2F;1494571&#x2F;attach&#x2F;3&#x2F;55583%20H%20Ali%20response.pdf?cookie_passthrough=1" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.whatdotheyknow.com&#x2F;request&#x2F;uk_border_force_power...

        Summary is they can’t detain people for no reason, they can detain people for specific offences relating to immigration and citizenship, customs and excise and also the normal stuff any regular police officer can arrest people for.

        I’m no apologist for how much state authority they have, but it’s not as bad as you’re making out.

        1. rdm_blackhole · · focus · HN ↗
          It is true.

          The UK border agents (technically counter-terrorism) can stop you at the border, force you into a room, ask for your passwords to all your devices and you don&#x27;t have the right to refuse.

          You also don&#x27;t have the right to a lawyer to be in a room with you and you are compelled to answer all their questions and they do not need to tell you why they stopped you.

          Then, if you are lucky they return your devices 7 days later after they have been through everything.

          This guy went through it last year and talks about what happens when they stop you: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;991kRp8KUmo?si=-5S1uLE7K9KG_gNj" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;youtu.be&#x2F;991kRp8KUmo?si=-5S1uLE7K9KG_gNj

          1. suslik · · focus · HN ↗
            &gt; you don&#x27;t have the right to refuse

            What happens if I still do? Or pretend that I forgot my pin and accidentally lock my phone down?

            1. rdm_blackhole · · focus · HN ↗
              The guy in the video explains exactly that.

              If you are a UK citizen, they will charge you under the terrorism act if you refuse to answer their questions or if you try to conceal anything or if you refuse to provide all the passwords to all your devices.

              As for what happens when you can genuinely not remember your passwords, I honestly don&#x27;t know. The guy in the video just gave them access to everything because he travels a lot and did not want to have to explain why he has a terrorism charge to his name every-time he has to apply for a new visa.

              Maybe you can refuse and stay silent and fight the charge later in court with a good lawyer but who knows. IANAL so do your own research before doing anything.

              As for what happens if you are a foreigner and refuse to unlock your devices&#x2F; answer their questions, they can deport you and potentially ban you from entering the country for a certain amount of time or indefinitely.

              1. godwinson__4-8 · · focus · HN ↗
                &gt; Maybe you can refuse and stay silent and fight the charge later in court with a good lawyer but who knows. IANAL...

                You ask who knows. Then you say IANAL. I&#x27;m excited for you. You&#x27;re so close to identifying who might know! Keep doing your own research, you got this.

                1. bigfishrunning · · focus · HN ↗
                  There is a problem when the laws are so convoluted that you need a professional interpreter, and those interpreters are prohibitively expensive.
                  1. godwinson__4-8 · · focus · HN ↗
                    Lawyers make YouTube videos. Lawyers, academics and legal advocacy groups often write copiously about these issues. You can find ways to interact with a lawyer which can be useful short of a prohibitively expensive retainer or representation.

                    The decision matrix around these things is often obvious. Most people simply comply. If you want to be one of the few people willing to stand up to these things, then good I commend you. But you&#x27;re going to have to put in some basic effort.

                    Or you could be extremely lazy and watch some random guys overwrought personal narrative which the commenter basically admitted was completely uninformative in explaining how the system actually works and then extrapolate from this video to make broad claims while simultaneously conceding you know pretty much nothing, and therefore are wasting everyone&#x27;s time. I&#x27;m not asking anyone to become a lawyer but is that really the best evidence they could come up with? It just seems like a basic information literacy failure that should not be encouraged.

                    Yes the law is convoluted and complicated. Free societies that need to balance the same tension humans have always struggled with - between freedom and safety - and try to do so in a fair way despite all the impulses and incentives for abuse are going to be complicated. Justice used to merely be the mob. Are you sure you don&#x27;t want the law to be complicated? You resent the modern need for the expertise of specialized lawyers? Do you complain medicine has gotten too complicated when the doctor doesn&#x27;t begin by hacking your limbs off?

                    1. bigfishrunning · · focus · HN ↗
                      &gt; Lawyers make YouTube videos.

                      Above you mocked &quot;Doing your own research&quot;; most of the people &quot;Doing their own research&quot; are watching these Youtube videos by people who claim to be lawyers and may or may not be. You can&#x27;t have it both ways.

                      1. godwinson__4-8 · · focus · HN ↗
                        Information literacy 101 would demand looking the person up. Or going to a law school&#x27;s channel rather than some random.

                        This really isn&#x27;t that hard.

                        Stop making excuses for mediocrity.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.