‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant

411 points · 378 comments · rbanffy

  1. Tangurena2 · · focus · HN ↗
    > “In [Fiscal Year] 2025, out of the over 419 million travelers CBP processed at ports of entry, CBP only searched the electronic devices of 55,318 international travelers,” the agency wrote, or 0.0013%.

    The harassment is targeted at critics & opponents of the current regime. The message is very clear: Be afraid of us. Be very afraid

    There are 33 days remaining until election day. Vote out all the incumbents.

    1. ct0 · · focus · HN ↗
      If you think that the current administration is the sole driver of this, and it will end once their term expires, I have a bridge to sell you.
      1. RHSeeger · · focus · HN ↗
        If you think the current administration hasn't pushed this so far beyond, and so much faster, what any previous administration has done - since maybe the red scare - I don't have a bridge to sell you. Because honestly, you shouldn't be anywhere near anything involving public welfare.
        1. raincole · · focus · HN ↗
          > The number of warrantless device searches at the border and the significant invasion of privacy they represent is only increasing. In Fiscal Year 2022, CBP conducted an all-time high of 45,499 device searches.

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2023&#x2F;05&#x2F;federal-judge-makes-history-holding-border-searches-cell-phones-require-warrant" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2023&#x2F;05&#x2F;federal-judge-makes-hi...

          But sure it&#x27;s the current administration what pushed this so far beyond. Beyond 40k phones into 50k phones!

          1. adhadion · · focus · HN ↗
            I really doubt the previous administration was trying to deprive people of their liberty based on their political beliefs. The current administration very clearly is. I can&#x27;t speak to any changes in the phone search policy, but your right to freedom of expression is gone at the federal level.

            <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;caught-in-crackdown-ice-cbp-doj-trump-arrests-convictions" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.propublica.org&#x2F;article&#x2F;caught-in-crackdown-ice-c...

            1. brandon272 · · focus · HN ↗
              <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37267299">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=37267299

              (2023)

              <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5192749">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=5192749

              (2013)

              There have been discussions on HN about this topic across administrations. That is not to say that there aren’t differences in degree, but the government has long maintained that it has special rights to conduct searches at the border that would not be permitted elsewhere.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.