‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Returning from vacation? The government can search your phone without a warrant

411 points · 378 comments · rbanffy

  1. Tangurena2 · · focus · HN ↗
    > “In [Fiscal Year] 2025, out of the over 419 million travelers CBP processed at ports of entry, CBP only searched the electronic devices of 55,318 international travelers,” the agency wrote, or 0.0013%.

    The harassment is targeted at critics & opponents of the current regime. The message is very clear: Be afraid of us. Be very afraid

    There are 33 days remaining until election day. Vote out all the incumbents.

    1. ct0 · · focus · HN ↗
      If you think that the current administration is the sole driver of this, and it will end once their term expires, I have a bridge to sell you.
      1. RHSeeger · · focus · HN ↗
        If you think the current administration hasn't pushed this so far beyond, and so much faster, what any previous administration has done - since maybe the red scare - I don't have a bridge to sell you. Because honestly, you shouldn't be anywhere near anything involving public welfare.
        1. raincole · · focus · HN ↗
          > The number of warrantless device searches at the border and the significant invasion of privacy they represent is only increasing. In Fiscal Year 2022, CBP conducted an all-time high of 45,499 device searches.

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2023&#x2F;05&#x2F;federal-judge-makes-history-holding-border-searches-cell-phones-require-warrant" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;www.eff.org&#x2F;deeplinks&#x2F;2023&#x2F;05&#x2F;federal-judge-makes-hi...

          But sure it&#x27;s the current administration what pushed this so far beyond. Beyond 40k phones into 50k phones!

          1. etiennebausson · · focus · HN ↗
            Given that travel hadn&#x27;t recovered from covid in 2022, that 45k to 55k increase mean even less.

            Has the % of people searched actually decreased?

            I don&#x27;t trust the current U.S. gov (or any U.S. gov, really), but the figure isn&#x27;t actually increasing in a significant way. The US. remain as unwelcoming to visitors as they have been since 2001. Nothing to see in this report.

            1. strictnein · · focus · HN ↗
              &gt; The US. remain as unwelcoming to visitors as they have been since 2001

              Strangely the stats don&#x27;t back your assertion. Wouldn&#x27;t being &quot;unwelcoming since 2001&quot; result in a decrease in travel?

              <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tourism_in_the_United_States#Visitor_statistics" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Tourism_in_the_United_States#V...

              1. y1n0 · · focus · HN ↗
                I’d look for a change in slope. A permanent change that adversely affected tourism would decrease the slope, but maybe not so much as to make it negative.
                1. strictnein · · focus · HN ↗
                  <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ourworldindata.org&#x2F;grapher&#x2F;international-tourist-trips?tab=slope&amp;time=earliest..2015&amp;country=USA~ESP~ITA~FRA~GBR~DEU~GRC~AUT" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;ourworldindata.org&#x2F;grapher&#x2F;international-tourist-tri...

                  Between 1995 and 2015 (capturing data before and after 2001) the US&#x27;s change in tourism increased at a faster rate than France, Italy, Greece, Germany, Austria, and the UK. Spain may have increased at a slightly faster pace, but it&#x27;s close.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.