Thread

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

1. anujdeshpande · 1790832119 · focus · HN ↗

   Neat!
2. Shekhartester · 1790842785 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

3. Tajnymag · 1790850387 · focus · HN ↗

   In "conclusion", there's no conclusion. The article can be summarised to: "we made Claude generate five wifi provisioning examples and some test scenarios, some are slower than others". That's it. There's almost nothing about how the things are implemented or what the recommended approach would be for common scenarios. It doesn't even work as marketing blog post very well.

   1. leoedin · 1790851326 · focus · HN ↗

      This is the second bad blog post I've seen from these guys. I work in embedded, I can totally see the value of a black box testing framework for embedded devices. Yet I read these blog posts and am left none-the-wiser about how it works.

      If the groundrun people are reading this, they should be focusing their blog posts on how their platform works and adds value, not just writing bad tutorials for ESP32s.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.