Thread

1. Almondsetat · 1790809198 · focus · HN ↗

   The incredible and futuristic technologies the US managed to deploy decades before the competition reminds me of the story of how the NRO gifted NASA a couple of their old decommissioned satellites in 2012 and they turned out to be basically upgraded Hubble telescopes pointed at earth. The US from the 90s to the 2000s had multiple Hubble-level telescopes just for spying while NASA was fighting for scraps to study the entire cosmos.

   1. shevy-java · 1790809556 · focus · HN ↗

      I am not entirely convinced. Was not Hubble damaged and got an upgrade lateron? I mean it could be possible that NASA is starved, but the repair involved other countries too, and I don't think the USA could keep mega-super-duper technology hidden from others in the long run. And NASA often wants more money - just take the whole search for life on planets. This is so pointless - life exists already here. What is the addiction to want to find life outside of the planet? Other than, of course, getting more money, which is understandable, but it doesn't answer the question. (Not that I am against better technology; the rationale just does not convince me at all here.)

      1. esseph · 1790811783 · focus · HN ↗

         > I don't think the USA could keep mega-super-duper technology hidden from others in the long run.

         The US has a history of keeping vehicles, weapons, and operations hidden for decades, even things in the past decade.

         > What is the addiction to want to find life outside of the planet?

         Knowledge. Trade. Technology. Weapons. Religion. Science. Sex (lol).

         "to explore strange new worlds

         to seek out new life and new civilizations

         to boldly go where no one has gone before!"

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.