‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Gemini 4 Argon

1699 points · 1187 comments · bradleyg223

  1. taylorfinley · · focus · HN ↗
    Ten days ago I had an experience with Gemini 3.8 flash that made me wonder if I was being routed to a different model under test. I was trying to use rocm with llama.cpp on my 128gb Strix Halo but could only get it to run Vulkan. I pasted the error message into agy and it proceeded to attach GDB to my GPU driver, reverse-engineer the kernel queue ioctl interface, and author an LD_PRELOAD C shim to get ROCm llama.cpp working on my Strix Halo. My jaw was hanging open the whole time.

    Edit to add the fix: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;birep&#x2F;6f2c8d490c7a29820997d57bd654c351" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;birep&#x2F;6f2c8d490c7a29820997d57bd654c3...

    1. spankalee · · focus · HN ↗
      3.8 Flash is just quite good, and so is the Antigravity harness.

      I use a mix of Fable 5.1, Opus 5.5, and Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini holds it&#x27;s own. Especially in writing, frontend, and sysadmin work. agy for configuring a NixOS system has been truly incredible.

      1. mapontosevenths · · focus · HN ↗
        Even if agy was the best (it&#x27;s not, and is missing basic features) you wouldn&#x27;t rather have a choice?

        I cancelled Ultra because they forced me into their harness like I should adapt to them, rather than the other way around.

        1. drusepth · · focus · HN ↗
          What basic features are missing from agy? I&#x27;ve been using it and cli-cc + web-cc for months (among a few other random harnesses to test here and there) and they all seem roughly comparable to me.

          I actually just cancelled Ultra also because I couldn&#x27;t subscribe to a YouTube Family plan while I had it active (Google... :[) but trying to use Codex as a replacement while I testdrive Astra makes me yearn for agy again.

          1. edg5000 · · focus · HN ↗
            Why use Codex CLI if you can use the ChatGPT app (which is a Codex GUI in all but name). Personally I weirdly got used to the terrible TUI stuff.
            1. krzyk · · focus · HN ↗
              Why use some GUI when there is a TUI?
              1. esafak · · focus · HN ↗
                Because &#x27;graphical&#x27; TUIs are pale imitations of GUIs. I don&#x27;t have a TUI fetish, despite having grown up with them.
                1. crossroadsguy · · focus · HN ↗
                  [delayed]
                  1. nsonha · · focus · HN ↗
                    You&#x27;re a software engineer living in a middle of an AI revolution and you confuse what IS with what CAN BE? GUI can be good people just didn&#x27;t do them because it took time and the foundation was shit (for the options that didn&#x27;t take time). That all changes now when a new class of software can be generated with AI. Unfortunately the people generating software and their users still base the decision on what IS (with highly technical reasoning such as &quot;infinitely better&quot;). People literally have the power to define what IS these days. I&#x27;ve only recently switched from claude and codex cli to their respective apps and those apps while not the best gui apps, already infinitely better than tui. The tui is actually hurting my main usage of them which is controlling agent programmatically. The only really point I&#x27;d give for TUI is compatibility. Running coding agent directly on android&#x2F;ios is nice sometimes.
                    1. crossroadsguy · · focus · HN ↗
                      [delayed]
                      1. nsonha · · focus · HN ↗
                        This is not about vision or anything like that it&#x27;s about thinking like actual engineers and understand that what accidentally IS will always be inferior to what is designated to (can) be. TUIs will always be a hack and good by accident.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.