‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Gemini 4 Argon

1699 points · 1187 comments · bradleyg223

  1. taylorfinley · · focus · HN ↗
    Ten days ago I had an experience with Gemini 3.8 flash that made me wonder if I was being routed to a different model under test. I was trying to use rocm with llama.cpp on my 128gb Strix Halo but could only get it to run Vulkan. I pasted the error message into agy and it proceeded to attach GDB to my GPU driver, reverse-engineer the kernel queue ioctl interface, and author an LD_PRELOAD C shim to get ROCm llama.cpp working on my Strix Halo. My jaw was hanging open the whole time.

    Edit to add the fix: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;birep&#x2F;6f2c8d490c7a29820997d57bd654c351" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;birep&#x2F;6f2c8d490c7a29820997d57bd654c3...

    1. KMnO4 · · focus · HN ↗
      My theory is that Gemini 3.8 Flash was supposed to be Gemini Pro, but by the time it was ready for release, Google was embarrassed at how far behind their &quot;pro&quot; model was, so they just named it Flash. It&#x27;s a good model, but don&#x27;t let the name trick you.
      1. w0m · · focus · HN ↗
        I&#x27;d agree if it wasn&#x27;t so much faster than ~all the other models. Maybe they nerfed reasoning to get that speed.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.