For background -- and I am not an expert here -- their C++ frontend is widely known. I first heard of it because Visual C++'s Intellisense uses it, which was notable because VC does not use the msvc frontend for its own completion. I understand it's been either used or evaluated for other frontends in the past too. I worked as PM for one C++ product, and was fortunate to be able to learn a lot from our engineers; we didn't use it, but they thought highly of EDG.
It has a very strong reputation for being correct. And as such, I think open sourcing it will be a very beneficial thing for the C++ community.
What is not to like, job security, it is a compiled language, standard is still ongoing (there is even OOP support), one can write microservices in it, there are IDEs, and most relevant, it is still much less English to type than AI Markdown files.
As curses go, not a curse! <a href="https://github.com/loveOSS/awesome-cobol" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/loveOSS/awesome-cobol
I'm really confused by this list: every link I click on either doesn't work or takes me to a project for Go written in Go. I haven't been able to navigate to a single Cobol project.
Yeah, going back and checking, it is weird. My bad, I am a little embarrassed, I too find no cobol, only Go.
To make up for my transgression ...
Here is Doom in Cobol tho <a href="https://github.com/deios0/cobol-doom" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/deios0/cobol-doom
Rock Paper Scissors in Cobol as a Cloudflare Worker <a href="https://github.com/cloudflare/cobol-worker/blob/master/src/worker.cob" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/cloudflare/cobol-worker/blob/master/src/w...
Still excited to see C++ get slowly replaced by better languages.
vintagedave · · focus · HN ↗
For background -- and I am not an expert here -- their C++ frontend is widely known. I first heard of it because Visual C++'s Intellisense uses it, which was notable because VC does not use the msvc frontend for its own completion. I understand it's been either used or evaluated for other frontends in the past too. I worked as PM for one C++ product, and was fortunate to be able to learn a lot from our engineers; we didn't use it, but they thought highly of EDG.
It has a very strong reputation for being correct. And as such, I think open sourcing it will be a very beneficial thing for the C++ community.
lelanthran · · focus · HN ↗
But also quite sad. They've announced that they are closing down.
genxy · · focus · HN ↗
bigbuppo · · focus · HN ↗
alex_suzuki · · focus · HN ↗
pjmlp · · focus · HN ↗
genxy · · focus · HN ↗
JBits · · focus · HN ↗
genxy · · focus · HN ↗
To make up for my transgression ...
Here is Doom in Cobol tho <a href="https://github.com/deios0/cobol-doom" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/deios0/cobol-doom
Rock Paper Scissors in Cobol as a Cloudflare Worker <a href="https://github.com/cloudflare/cobol-worker/blob/master/src/worker.cob" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/cloudflare/cobol-worker/blob/master/src/w...
Still excited to see C++ get slowly replaced by better languages.