‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Commit description as a thinking tool

130 points · 78 comments · yedhukrishnan

  1. dkarl · · focus · HN ↗
    I was forced to give up on commit messages long before AI, because other people were so bad at them that I happily agreed that all PRs should squash commits.

    At least then the squashed messages were usually pretty decent. But then people started using AI (or AI started using people) to create absolutely massive commit messages that are impossible to skim in git blame and overall very bad for human consumption.

    AI has made massive strides in virtually every other way. Why do they continue to write in a wasteful, human-hostile way?

    I think we'd have to be be very naive not to suspect that this is intentional. AI companies have a stated goal of replacing humans in the software development process, and they're actively making the process itself inhospitable for humans.

    They are injecting massive amounts of text into their customers' development process, which then becomes tokens that their customers will then pay them to process over and over again. It's like a CO2 scrubber that emits CO2.

    1. luipugs · · focus · HN ↗
      I suspect there&#x27;s a prompt one can add to improve the consumption of commit messages for humans, just that the default one is pretty bad. Kind of similar to the AI generated posters a few weeks back: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49764791">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;news.ycombinator.com&#x2F;item?id=49764791.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.