Thread

1. atkrista · 1790765554 · focus · HN ↗

   I would just LOVE to see all the behind-the-scenes shithousery both companies are employing to one-up the other in this, largely, 2-horse AGI race. Someone should make a mockumentary when all is said and done!

   1. nbardy · 1790766299 · focus · HN ↗

      I think it's weirdly just a choice of deciding to cut releases.

      We already know OpenAI has "bel" that is MUCH better than astra and is being used internally

      1. 233mhz · 1790769609 · focus · HN ↗

         > We already know OpenAI has "bel" that is MUCH better than astra and is being used internally

         I mean, isn't it almost a guarantee that what we get is a gimped version of what they use internally? They probably already serve themselves next gen level models at 1k+ tps from cerebras machines hosted on perm while we get quantized astra/opus at 50tps on a good day

         1. arcfour · 1790783539 · focus · HN ↗

            Was it not essentially confirmed that all of the frontier labs have much stronger models internally that don't make sense to serve at scale yet, which they use for development and to train models that are able to be served at scale?

            1. Alifatisk · 1790788028 · focus · HN ↗

               Where was this confirmed?

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.