Thread

1. atkrista · 1790765554 · focus · HN ↗

   I would just LOVE to see all the behind-the-scenes shithousery both companies are employing to one-up the other in this, largely, 2-horse AGI race. Someone should make a mockumentary when all is said and done!

   1. nbardy · 1790766299 · focus · HN ↗

      I think it's weirdly just a choice of deciding to cut releases.

      We already know OpenAI has "bel" that is MUCH better than astra and is being used internally

      1. iLoveOncall · 1790766729 · focus · HN ↗

         > We already know OpenAI has "bel" that is MUCH better than astra and is being used internally

         You're just believing their own bullshit. There's no indication that this is true except from claims from people working at OpenAI.

         If they really had a much more powerful model, it would make absolutely no sense to sit on it.

         1. 233mhz · 1790769672 · focus · HN ↗

            > If they really had a much more powerful model, it would make absolutely no sense to sit on it.

            Makes total sense if they don't have the compute and can't serve it in an economically viable way. Also it lets you build things no one else in the world can build as fast as you until it's released

            1. iLoveOncall · 1790771650 · focus · HN ↗

               > Also it lets you build things no one else in the world can build as fast as you until it's released

               "We can generate slop faster than anyone in the world" :evil_emoji:

            2. owebmaster · 1790825216 · focus · HN ↗

               This theory would be easy to prove IF openai was pushing high quality software. It's not.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.