Thread

1. mlboss · 1790816419 · focus · HN ↗

   There is a very simple solution to the problem. Just add a tax to single people and childless couples or reverse give huge tax break to married and couple with kids.

   In past the motive for marriage was sex and companionship which was frowned in society if out of wedlock. Now it is not frowned upon. The old constraint is gone and we need to add new constraints if we want to solve the problem.

   1. croes · 1790818929 · focus · HN ↗

      That’s how you get loveless marriages and kids whose purpose is being a tax break.

      Good wages, enough free time, affordable housing, free child care, universal healthcare.

      That’s the better way.

      There plenty of people who want to marry and get kids but they don’t have enough time and money.

      1. TFNA · 1790823784 · focus · HN ↗

         > Good wages, enough free time, affordable housing, free child care, universal healthcare.

         Nordic countries did this. Birthrates have been declining regardless. Even Gulf Arab countries which are an even more enviable welfare state, and have considerable religious-cultural emphasis on childraising, too, have seen declining birthrates.

         1. SXX · 1790831825 · focus · HN ↗

            Birthrates decline is unrelated process which is just stronger than those incentives.

            Do you aware how expensive Nordic countries are to live in and have social life even counting all the free stuff?

            And gulf arab countries are basically even worse in this regard.

            1. fragmede · 1790832415 · focus · HN ↗

               It's simpler than that. People need to have hope for the future. With the climate going to shit, who wants to subject a child to that?

               1. TFNA · 1790834658 · focus · HN ↗

                  You might want to get out more. Climate-change concerns are amplified online like many other kinds of activism, but if you travel countries with declining birthrates, you'll rarely hear people IRL speaking of them.

                  1. viraptor · 1790855270 · focus · HN ↗

                     A lot of this is just a difference in topics for conversations - local/global. See: us talking here about a Singapore dating app, when likely neither of us two is in Singapore and at least one is already married. On the other hand, people in my circle are worried about the climate change concerns and we're aware of that... but it's not often a topic of conversation. It's not the concern that's amplified, just the topic is more frequent. But it doesn't mean I'm not seriously worried about my kid having to migrate in later life due to local agriculture becoming not viable at scale, one of the dumb wars turning into ww3, or just dying due to one of the current climate effects turning into a feedback loop that we can't survive within the next few generations.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.